Wednesday, September 20, 2006

Egypt and Nuclear power

Mubarak’s Son Proposes Nuclear Program - New York Times: Remarks on nuclear power by Gamal Mubarak, the son of Egypt’s president, raised expectations that he was being positioned as a successor. By MICHAEL SLACKMAN and MONA EL-NAGGAR, Published: September 20, 2006.
Gamal Mubarak, the son of Egypt’s president, proposed Tuesday that his country pursue nuclear energy, drawing strong applause from the nation’s political elite, while raising expectations that Mr. Mubarak is being positioned to replace his father as president.

The carefully crafted political speech raised the prospect of two potentially embarrassing developments for the White House at a time when the region is awash in crisis: a nuclear program in Egypt, recipient of about $2 billion a year in military and development aid from the United States, and Mr. Mubarak succeeding his father, Hosni Mubarak, as president without substantial political challenge. Simply raising the topic of Egypt’s nuclear ambitions at a time of heightened tensions over Iran’s nuclear activity was received as a calculated effort to raise the younger Mr. Mubarak’s profile and to build public support through a show of defiance toward Washington, political analysts and foreign affairs experts said.

“The whole world, I don’t want to say all, but many developing countries, have proposed and started to execute the issue of alternative energy,” he said. “It is time for Egypt to put forth, and the party will put forth, this proposal for discussion about its future energy policies, the issue of alternative energy, including nuclear energy, as one of the alternatives.” He also said in a clear reference to the White House: “We do not accept visions from abroad that try to dissolve the Arab identity and the joint Arab efforts within the framework of the so-called Greater Middle East Initiative."
I think it’s interesting that the signal to the pundits and electorate of Egypt that Hosni Mubarak’s son is a serious candidate for the presidency is that he is challenging the U.S. and the world by announcing he wants his country to go nuclear. All I can think of is, what have we wrought?

The peace crowd might ultimately be right on this one. During World War II there was a race to obtain nuclear weapons, with the U.S., Germany and even Japan scrambling to become the first to have this deliverer of hell on earth. Luckily, we won that race, and because of it, we won the war.

Then Russia got nuclear weapons and Israel and India and on and on. Now, the truly bad guys are getting them, like Iran. Egypt is not necessarily one of the bad guys. They have been pretty good neighbors to Israel and the world since 1978, so I don’t have a great fear of their irrationality like I do with Iran, which wants to wipe Israel off the map.

Still, the overall picture is grim. Nuclear bombs “mushrooming” all over the place. (List of countries with nuclear weapons) One day at least one of them is going to go off, on people. You just know that. All you need is one maniac organization, like Al-Queda, or one maniac country, like Iran, and there you go.

How do we get rid of all the nukes? I don’t know. I have no idea. We’d better get smart about this, though, because the clock is ticking.

Rock

(*Wikipedia is always my source unless indicated.)

This Post’s Technorati Tags: Gamal Mubarak, nuclear weapons, Egypt, Greater Middle East, Hosni Mubarak, Al-Queda, truth

Subscribe to my feed
                                          

Join me in the war on error, in the fight for truth, justice, and the American way! Support this site! Wanna swap links? It’ll help us both. Truth—The No Spin Politically Incorrect Zone

Join Rock's Political Blog Ring. Both Liberals and Conservatives are Welcome. (see left side bar or below these posts)

New! Join Rock's Chatroom and Rock’s Truth Forum, both uncensored. You’ll be a bit lonely for now, until traffic starts to discover these new venues, but whenever I’m on line, I’ll check to see if anyone’s chatting. It’d be nice if I could program an email to myself when someone wants to chat, we’ll see.

Plus, I have added a special poll each week, where I craft the poll questions, Rock's Poll Question of the Week. This week's question is, "Who do you think is politicizing 9/11?"


13 comments:

Anonymous said...

So, WMD proliferation is inevitable.

Big deal.

Soviets didn't use it. Mao's china (textbook case of maniac state) didn't use it. Neither did they give WMDs to their clients or their terrorist organizations.

Don't tread on people with a nuke, and they won't use it.

If anything, the WMDs would keep imperial lunatics (like neo-cons) where they belong - in a closet.

And ! the israeli/arab conflict would have to be resolved to satisfy both parties - and not only you, rocky !

And who would be the loser ? Rock ! There would be no world-wide neocon/Israeli empire for poor Rock...

Rock said...

Good theory, igor, treat the terrorists nice and they'll be nice too. That makes a lot of sense! That worked in the past, didn't it--like with Hitler, Musolini, Japan, even your favorite country, Russia. Yeah, you're so right. Just be nice to these bad guys and they won't attack. You ought to be the Secretary of Defense. I'd feel so safe with you in charge.

Thanks again, igor, for your brilliant insights.

Rock said...

"Treat others the way you yourself wish to be treated".

Kind of like the way you treat people, huh igor? I get it.

Anonymous said...

and, may I ask, what is wrong with my treatment of people?
and who are those "people", exactly?
you? yeah, probably only you.

then, why do you call yourself "people"? is it your hubris: "Me, The People ..." ?

why, rocky, I treat you exactly like you treat billions of people (you choose to call them "animals") whose only fault is that they don't want to live according to your neo-con instructions.


BTW, Rock, you (again!) are dodging the subject of our exchange. I conclude that you know that you are wrong, but you got no guts to admit it.

Rock said...

igor, you don't even know what a neo-con is. I'll give you a hint, it's the opposite of you.

Anonymous said...

rock, this your latest statement that "a neo-con is the opposite of you [me]" seems to have absolute nothing to do with the subject of this thread.

why, no, I am not a neo-con and my view of the human world is opposite to that of Mr.Strauss, Mr.Wohlstetter, Mr.Marshall, Mr.Wolfowitz, Mr.Perle, Mr.Kristol and others. What a discovery !!!!

So? What is the meaning of that your statement? How does it relate to the subject of this our discussion - which is: "treat people like..." ???

It seems to me that your mind is in the same mess as your website. Or, putting it more correctly, the mess of your website is mirror image of the mess in your mind.

Like, the above: you saw the word "neo-con" in my comment and you rambles the first thing that springs to your mind by some association.... Sheesh...

Rock said...

Yeah, you're right. My mind is probably just like my Website, I agree. What an insight. I made the site. I take responsibility for it, in all it's glory, and all its mess.

Where's your Website? I guess your mind is represented by the drivel you post in your comments, right?

Anonymous said...

drivel ? what drivel ? pls, give a specific example of that supposed drivel of mine in this thread.

Rock said...

igor, pick a comment of yours, take the whole thing, from any comment you've ever written--drivel. It's all drivel.

If you don't know what your drivel is, just decide to write the opposite of what your instincts tell you to write, and it probably won't be drivel. Your instincts are drivel. They stem from decay and ignorance. Drivel.

Rock said...

You got it igor, drivel, drivel, drivel. I think your last name is drivel, Igor Drivel. Your mother's name is Mrs. Drivel. Your father was Mr. Drivel, and they had you, little igor drivel. You dog's name is Drivel, and your cat. Your whole Drivel family goes out not for a drive, but a drivel. You drivel to the grocery store, to the park, to the welfare office to get your check, and to your local pub, where you drive people away with your drivel.

You are so involved with drivel that you have been drivelled mad. You drivel people away from you. When you eat soup you drivel some of it on your chin.

Other people have drive, you have drivel. Other people are driven to success, you are drivelled to failure. You are a drivelled man.

igor drivel, best driveller in the land.

Rock said...

Well, igor, congratulations, at least this drivel you've written sounds a little different from the usual drivel you write. Sounds like you're really trying to think. That's a good thing. Keep it up. Maybe one day you'll have a rational idea. Then we'll have a party.

Oh, don't worry--you'll be in Canada and I'll be in L.A., I mean a figurative party, a moment of celebration in honor of igor's first actual thought. You can even buy a party hat for the occasion, but I'm getting ahead of myself. We'll just be patient and wait for that first rational comment to be made. Until then, drivel on.

Rock said...

What? You erased your recent drivel? Why? It was the first sign of thought I've ever seen from you! Too bad, I loved seeing that flickering of a mind peeking through the usual nonsense you send. Oh, well, I guess it was too much of a strain on you.

Nighty night igor. Pleasant dreams in igorland.

Rock said...

Oh, there, it's back again. Good. I can rest assured that you are trying to think. Keep it up, igor. I'm on your side.